gba paid apk ‘Gladiator II,’ Behind Paul Mescal and Denzel Washington, Is a Spectacle That SatisfiesNone

COVID pregnancies may have boosted autism risk, UCLA study shows

Seize the dayA father with the power to keep his son out of jail: it shouldn’t be surprising that President Biden used that power even though he said he wouldn’t. The rule of law and all that... But then an election happened, and the future government took hold with hardliners ready to avenge any real or perceived wrongdoing against Donald J. Trump . The Biden family traditionally makes big decisions around the dinner table on a holiday. This Thanksgiving in Nantucket was no different and with Hunter there and Biden’s days in office dwindling down to a precious few, Hunter’s freedom and his hard-won sobriety were top of mind for everyone. Biden’s strong tie to his family is at the core of his being, his role as a father the most important to him—greater than any political fallout. ADVERTISEMENT No one with a heart would begrudge Biden for pardoning his only living son. The blunder Biden made was promising not to pardon his son whenever the question was posed. He may have had that intention before a plea deal fell apart a year ago in July. But once it became clear prosecutors working for his DOJ were not letting up, Hunter went public with the family’s thinking, and it went like this: This is a political inspired prosecution. They’re trying to destroy Hunter to undermine his father’s presidency, knowing that was the one thing that could break Biden. This thinking was in place before the Trump nominations of Matt Gaetz and then Pam Bondi for AG, and Kash Patel for FBI director. Biden could not let his remaining son be used as an instrument to get at him and tarnish his legacy. The Trump picks are on record declaring fealty to Trump and his agenda of seeking retribution and disrupting what they call the deep state. Biden could have stopped short of a full pardon and commuted his son’s jail sentences. Hunter would have been sentenced this week in Delaware on three gun charges related to his falsely signing a form that attested he wasn’t using drugs in order to purchase a handgun he never fired. He was scheduled to be sentenced in California next week on tax evasion after he has paid back taxes with interest and penalties. The problem with commutation is that it would only impact these two cases, and the Bidens, father and son, are convinced that Trump and his allies will never let Hunter go in peace. He would be harassed for at least another four years, maybe more. He’d be the new Benghazi, the issue that haunted Hillary Clinton for years with multiple investigations without ever finding any wrongdoing. The only upside for Democrats in the pardon is that it takes Hunter off the playing field as MAGA’s favorite football to kick around. Indeed, MAGA reacted angrily to the announcement , with Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene describing Joe Biden as “a liar and a hypocrite, all the way to the end.” Even so, the amount of criticism (from Democrats as well as Republicans) is surprising. It’s hard to see how anyone could begrudge Biden for saving his son, especially when most of the critics weren’t the least disturbed by the pardons issued by Trump during his first term to buddies like Roger Stone and Steve Bannon. Biden is expected to issue dozens if not hundreds more pardons before he leaves office. They should include preemptive pardons for others caught up in the partisan warfare. Biden may be emboldened by the outcry over Hunter and seek to avenge his decision to stand by his son with pardons for other imperiled figures like the military generals Trump disparages for being woke in the hyper-male culture he values. Presidents use pardons to further their policies and their values. With marijuana now legal in most states, Biden should pardon those still languishing in prison for having a small amount of marijuana. We’re not talking about the kingpins, the dealers, but others who were victimized by laws that are no longer relevant. He could also broaden the relevance of his son’s pardon by finding others serving sentences for falsely signing a document to buy a gun with no other alleged crime, or those who went to jail after repaying back taxes with interest and penalties. They’re tough to find, and that’s the point. This isn’t about overturning the rule of law to reward his son; it’s about righting a wrong.COVID pregnancies may have boosted autism risk, UCLA study shows

TimesLIVE

Ange Postecoglou searching for answers over Tottenham’s injury crisisLife expectancy is back in the news, with recent revelations that Australians' life expectancy has fallen for the second year in a row, thanks to COVID-19. Well, of course, bad news makes good headlines, but do you need to be worried? Not at all. Life expectancy tables are just a snapshot of the population as a whole and have nothing to do with individuals. And, like the property market, it varies from region to region. For example, life expectancy in North Britain is six years less than life expectancy in the South - all because of lifestyle. or signup to continue reading Of course, getting an idea of how long you might live is important when you're deciding how much money you will need when you retire. But the biggest factor in how long a person lives is really how they live - that's the good news! Keep in mind that you should treat any projected life expectancy figures with healthy scepticism - how can anybody accurately forecast what medical breakthroughs will occur over the next 100 years? Not long ago, featured a striking headline: "This Baby Might Live To 120," highlighting medical breakthroughs extending human life spans. One notable aspect was a genetic disorder that stunts growth, but also shields against cancer and diabetes. Isolating this gene could mean breakthroughs in preventing these diseases altogether. David Williams, founder of My Longevity Pty Ltd, introduced the SHAPE acronym to help people estimate their life expectancy: Surroundings, Health, Attitude, Parents, and Eating habits. It's a sensible approach: those with supportive environments, good health, a positive outlook, favourable genetics, and balanced nutrition often outlive those who lack these advantages. Over time, our differences amplify, underscoring that personalised strategies work. On his website, , Williams offers a free SHAPE Analyser quiz for anyone over 44. It's a simple, five-minute tool that projects life expectancy and initiates a personalised longevity plan, guiding users to map out and maximise their future. I highly recommend trying it. But remember that life isn't static: your outlook and habits can shift over time. Research suggests that the longer you live, the greater your chances of living even longer, with the dependent phase shortening. Thus, strategic planning becomes essential, especially in a situation where one partner is fully functioning and the other partner needs care. For those aged 50 today, reaching 100 isn't far-fetched. There's a financial challenge in this: if you retire at 65, you'll need to prepare for another 35 years without income. There are two things to focus on: optimising your returns on financial assets, and optimising your lifestyle to maximise your retirement happiness. Irrespective of how long we live there are two major factors that have been proven to make for a happier, healthier and more fulfilling retirement. These are a sense of purpose, and a good social network. Having activities that give you purpose is vital - it's the reason to get out of bed in the morning. These activities can range from pursuing hobbies or playing sports to joining your body corporate's committee. The crucial thing is staying active and involved. In my opinion, the ideal environment for older retirees is a well-chosen retirement village. The best ones offer a wide array of activities that foster engagement and help sustain a sense of purpose. One of the most significant advantages of a retirement village is the support the community can offer when one partner passes away. Few things are as difficult as living alone at home after a partner's death, and many widows and widowers quickly become isolated and lonely without social support. In contrast, retirement villages offer companionship, understanding, and a shared community, ensuring that life continues with connection and comfort. Both a reversionary pension and a binding death benefit nomination are instructions to say what happens to your super when you die. A reversionary pension states that your existing super pension will continue to somebody else when you die, while a binding death benefit nomination says what happens to your super/pension when you die. A binding nomination is flexible as your money can go to a range of people in different proportions and can be used in the super and pension environments. Reversionary beneficiaries are restricted to the pension arena and can be given to only one person, which is usually your partner. There are circumstances where adding a reversionary beneficiary can provide positive and or negative impacts for income tested age pension recipients and those in aged care, particularly if the income stream was purchased prior to 1 January 2015. You need to understand the specific rules of the super fund you are in, as each fund can have variances in each type of nomination. For those with large pension balances the implications can be significant, particularly those with Self-Managed Super Funds. As always, seek advice pertaining to the specifics of your situation as what may seem quite simple, can actually be quite complex in certain circumstances. John Perri of Amp Technical says SG vouchers are treated as concessional contributions - they are effectively SGC shortfall amounts paid to the ATO by employers who have not met their SG obligations, and in turn are paid to the super fund of the employee. It's the perfect strategy. Because she is not of pensionable age the money will not count as an asset against your pension unless she starts to draw an income from it- she can still access any time if she needs. DAILY Today's top stories curated by our news team. WEEKDAYS Grab a quick bite of today's latest news from around the region and the nation. WEEKLY The latest news, results & expert analysis. WEEKDAYS Catch up on the news of the day and unwind with great reading for your evening. WEEKLY Get the editor's insights: what's happening & why it matters. WEEKLY Love footy? We've got all the action covered. WEEKLY Every Saturday and Tuesday, explore destinations deals, tips & travel writing to transport you around the globe. WEEKLY Going out or staying in? Find out what's on. WEEKDAYS Sharp. Close to the ground. Digging deep. Your weekday morning newsletter on national affairs, politics and more. TWICE WEEKLY Your essential national news digest: all the big issues on Wednesday and great reading every Saturday. WEEKLY Get news, reviews and expert insights every Thursday from CarExpert, ACM's exclusive motoring partner. TWICE WEEKLY Get real, Australia! Let the ACM network's editors and journalists bring you news and views from all over. AS IT HAPPENS Be the first to know when news breaks. DAILY Your digital replica of Today's Paper. Ready to read from 5am! DAILY Test your skills with interactive crosswords, sudoku & trivia. Fresh daily! Advertisement Advertisement

Donald Trump is returning to the Oval Office at a time when cybersecurity concerns are only growing . On his watch, the nation will face threats from international cyber crime gangs that hack hospitals, schools, cities and major companies. Cyber extortionists are constantly evolving their pressure techniques. International tensions are also playing out in cyber space. China-backed hackers have been penetrating systems essential to U.S. life, including water systems and power grids. Some fear China could try to these systems, should geopolitical tensions rise. As his administration responds to such threats, Trump isn’t expected to follow President Joe Biden’s playbook entirely. Biden often tried to use regulations to compel organizations in critical sectors to improve their cyber defenses. Trump will more likely seek to reduce regulations, trying to find ways to encourage voluntary improvements from the private sector. He may also put more emphasis on hacking adversaries’ IT infrastructure. A considerable number of Republican lawmakers have also called for slashing the budget of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). They believe it mis-stepped in past efforts to discourage the spread online of election-related disinformation. That agency does far more than call out disinformation, however. It also issues alerts about cyber threats and helps support state and local governments, as well as the private sector, in defending . Some experts believe the cyber agency could lose some of its authority but that there’s enough bipartisan support for its other work that Trump and the new Congress will refrain from eliminating it altogether. Although the new administration’s plans in regard to technology policy in general are still evolving, here are some of the dynamics observers in the field expect to see emerging over the next four years: One of CISA’s many responsibilities is election security. Some conservatives remain unhappy that the agency contacted social media companies about probable election-related disinformation on their platforms during the 2020 election. They charge that this amounted to CISA censoring free speech and unfairly targeting conservative voices. The agency denies these complaints but discontinued such activities prior to the 2022 election. In September, more than 100 House Republicans made a failed effort to cut CISA’s funding heavily. Project 2025 — a transition document prepared by the Heritage Foundation and authored, in part, by new Trump appointees — calls for moving CISA into a different federal department and reassigning any duplicative cybersecurity work to other agencies. Trump himself has had a mixed relationship with CISA. He signed the act that created it, then at the end of his first term famously , then its director, for insisting the 2020 election was secure. Some lawmakers in 2021 from presidential changes by giving the CISA director a five-year term but their bill failed. Accusations against CISA could get a stronger voice when Kentucky Republican Rand Paul, a critic, becomes chair of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Despite the criticism it's attracted from some quarters, CISA will probably not be dismantled under Trump, thanks to the valuable — and less-controversial — work it does in other areas, including protecting critical infrastructure and election processes from cyber and physical attacks. There’s also been both industry and bipartisan political support for CISA projects such as the initiative — which asks software developers to design their products with cybersecurity in mind — and the , a public-private information sharing and collaboration project. “I don’t think they’re going to get rid of CISA,” says Mark Montgomery, senior director of the Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “I think even Rand Paul knows he can't get rid of CISA, although he's pissed at it.” Cybersecurity is an international question, with many ransomware criminals conducting attacks from overseas while operating out of safe harbor countries like Russia. And nation-states are a pressing threat, with China-backed hackers having penetrated U.S. , perhaps readying to disrupt them should geopolitical tensions rise. China-linked actors also recently were found hacking deep into U.S. telecommunications networks, where they apparently spied on U.S. wiretapping and captured . The Trump administration may want to go on the offensive against such threats. His first administration supported increasing efforts to in order to combat adversary hackers and prepare to disable IT infrastructure in case of a future conflict. A more aggressive approach might entail efforts to disrupt IT infrastructure used by cyber criminals in the countries harboring them, and potentially imposing sanctions in response to China-backed hacks on U.S. critical infrastructure, as well as being more aggressive in efforts to arrest or prosecute cyber criminals and other actions, says Michael Daniel, president and CEO of the nonprofit Cyber Threat Alliance. The Trump administration will probably “call out Chinese misbehavior a little more,” Montgomery suggests, while continuing to help partner nations hunt malicious behavior lurking in their networks. But when it comes to working with other nations, Trump will probably be less interested in multilateral collaborations, Daniel says, and instead focus on one-on-one relationships with other countries. The U.S. is also unlikely to ratify the , he says, both because of its multilateral nature and objections from privacy, civil liberties and law enforcement groups. The impact of cyber attacks on critical infrastructure can be massive. Last summer’s , a health-care tech company, affected roughly a third of Americans. Separately, the Environmental Protection Agency warns that drinking water systems are falling seriously short of necessary cyber protections. The Biden administration often looked to regulation to safeguard these and other critical infrastructure sectors. In the wake of the Change Healthcare attack, it announced plans to set minimum cybersecurity standards for hospitals. The EPA also tried, although unsuccessfully, to use its authority to require public water systems to assess their cybersecurity periodically. And the Biden administration responded to the 2021 ransomware attack on , which caused gasoline panic buying in the Southeastern states that depleted many gas stations, by setting cybersecurity requirements for pipeline owners and operators. As the incoming administration considers how best to defend health care, water and other critical infrastructure, it is more likely to seek to reduce regulations, not add to them. The Trump team is expected to emphasize private-sector collaboration and voluntary efforts, potentially including offering some incentives. The , enacted in 2022, was designed to help the federal government better understand the cyber threats facing the nation and warn potential victims about threats more quickly. But the law is not expected to be implemented until 2026. In the meantime, CISA has been hammering out details for how to put it into action. The Trump administration will be looking to harmonize the 2022 law with other existing federal cyber incident reporting regulations, Montgomery says. Some have questioned if South Dakota Gov. , Trump’s pick to run the Department of Homeland Security, might push back on the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program. South Dakota was the only state that repeatedly declined to participate in it. The law is set to expire in 2025, after four years. Many state government cyber leaders have said that four years’ worth of grants has been helpful but not enough money to meet their needs. They’re calling for a reliable, recurring stream of cybersecurity funds. Full Republican control of Congress could lead to progress on data privacy legislation. That effort has been at a standstill due to arguments over issues such as whether a federal law would pre-empt existing state privacy laws or allow private right of action. California lawmakers have been strong opponents of any federal law superseding their strong state policy, and this dispute prompted former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, to frustrate an earlier attempt to pass a federal law. California’s Democrat-dominated delegation will have less influence now, however. The Trump administration’s lighter approach to regulation will inform its approach to artificial intelligence, as well. A Biden invoked the Defense Production Act to require tech companies to inform the federal government if they’re training advanced AI models that present a “serious risk” to national security, economic security or public health and safety, as well as to share safety test information. The order also called for efforts to combat algorithmic discrimination and for creating new standards and tools to test if AI systems were “safe, secure, and trustworthy” before they’re released to the public. Trump’s campaign platform included a promise to repeal the order, characterizing its use of the Defense Production Act as government overreach. Efforts to prevent unfairness and bias in AI systems are likely to be less of a priority for the Trump administration, says Daniel Castro, vice president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a tech think tank. Under Trump, the focus will shift to questions such as whether AI systems perform as advertised, or will AI used in medical devices, transit systems or other areas cause physical harms to users. AI companies are facing , and often don’t realize the level of security they need to defend against both nation-state and non-nation-state actors, says Montgomery, of the Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation. He hopes the incoming administration reaches an agreement with companies on a minimum cyber and physical security standard for AI labs. “This administration is going to take a much more laissez-faire attitude, in general, to the AI labs, but I hope in the very specific area of security, they actually turn the screws more than what has happened so far,” Montgomery says. Trump is also reportedly weighing whether to . Such an official would be charged with coordinating federal policies on AI, guiding government use of the technology and helping the new Department of Government Efficiency use AI to find fraud and waste. Meanwhile, the fate of a major Biden-era effort to boost the domestic semiconductor industry is unclear. The 2022 bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act promised billions to incentivize U.S.-based semiconductor chip manufacturing, research and development. On Tuesday, Intel secured an $8 billion grant under the program. Trump has , arguing that his tariff plans would do more to shift production to the U.S. without requiring government spending. Most of the subsidies authorized by the CHIPS Act , but the Biden administration intends distribute “almost all” the money before Trump takes office, according to Commerce Secretary . And, although many conservatives have criticized social media companies for alleged censorship, it’s unclear if the Trump administration would seek to roll back the legal protections that allow for content moderation. of the Communications Decency Act shields online services from civil liability over user-created content they host. It also allows social media companies to make well-intentioned efforts to moderate user-posted content, including letting them take down posts they deem harassing, obscene or otherwise objectionable. Some Republicans have sought to rewrite Section 230 to prevent what they view as social media platforms censoring conservative voices. However, Castro says that while companies are likely to take extra care to display neutrality in content moderation, the situation has changed. Trump and Elon Musk — a major Trump financial backer and co-leader of the new Department of Government Efficiency — both own social media platforms, potentially dampening desires for Section 230 repeal. Government Technology'sSecret Pentagon study hints at reincarnation being real after finding consciousness 'never dies'

Tharimmune Announces $2.02 Million Private Placement to Advance Development ProgramsNorthern California was under a rare and brief tsunami warning alert Thursday that tested local emergency notification systems after a 7.0 magnitude earthquake shook part of the state. The National Weather Service canceled its alert after roughly an hour and before the tsunami was expected to arrive. In that hour, some cities and counties ordered evacuations while others relied on social media and text messages to inform people of the warning. Some people headed for higher ground, while others drove to the beach to get a better view. People took to social media to figure out why a warning was issued and then canceled so quickly, and how the NWS determines when to send alerts. Here are answers to more questions. What exactly is a tsunami? The word for tsunami comes from the Japanese characters for harbor and wave. It's a series of extremely long waves set in motion when energy from an earthquake causes the ocean floor to suddenly rise or fall, according to the National Weather Service. How common are they in California? Since 1800, California's shores have been struck by more than 150 tsunamis, most of them minor, according to the California Geological Survey. Phones buzzed Thursday when the National Weather Service issued its warning just minutes after the quake struck west of Ferndale, a small city in coastal Humboldt County. It read in part: “You are in danger. Get away from coastal waters. Move to high ground or inland now.” Why was there an alert if there wasn't a large tsunami? The National Weather Service Bay Area posted on the social platform X early Friday that the region doesn't get tsunami alerts often and “there are lot of questions, frustration, and even some anger” about Thursday's event. A warning alert is the most serious of four tsunami alerts, including a watch alert for a possible tsunami and an advisory alert telling people to stay out of the water and away from the shore. The last time California received a warning alert was 2011 when an earthquake in Japan caused about $100 million in damages along the California coast. Basically, a distant, offshore earthquake or other trigger event gives scientists more time to analyze data and confirm that a large tsunami was generated before sounding a warning. But Thursday’s earthquake was local and close to the coast, forcing a hasty high-level alert in order to give people the maximum time to prepare as tsunami waves can travel very fast, up to 500 mph (800 kph) in the deep ocean, the NWS wrote. “By the time we actually observe it, it may be too late, because it's right there in our back doors,” said Dalton Behringer, a meteorologist with NWS Bay Area, on Friday. Scientists used the time Thursday to monitor buoys and get more information on the earthquake itself, he said. They canceled the alert after seeing little sea-level change and determining the quake was a strike-slip type of temblor that shifts more horizontally and is less prone to cause tsunamis, he said. “These things happen so infrequently for us, I think it just caught a lot of people off-guard,” he said. How did Northern California respond? Authorities in Eureka, the biggest city in Humboldt County, sent texts and went door-to-door to order businesses in high-risk areas to evacuate, said City Manager Miles Slattery. He said only a small portion of the city was at risk, and Thursday's test run showed evacuees need to work on leaving by foot, rather than by car. In the San Francisco Bay Area, the commuter light-rail system known as BART stopped traffic in all directions through the underwater tunnel between San Francisco and Oakland, and the San Francisco Zoo’s visitors were evacuated. Responses varied as fire and police in Berkeley evacuated certain areas of the city while in San Francisco, officials sent alerts and messages on social media telling residents to stay away from water, beaches, harbors, marina docks, and piers. “Move at least one block inland,” said the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management. Emergency personnel in vehicles with public address systems also went to make sure no one was on beaches and other low-lying areas. But some critics said San Francisco should have sounded its loud emergency sirens, which have been off-line since 2019 for repairs. In San Mateo County, just south of San Francisco, officials considered but decided against sounding its tsunami warning sirens after receiving more comprehensive information from the NWS that any tsunami would affect coastlines north of the Golden Gate Bridge, said Michelle Durand, a spokesperson for the county. Fire and police cleared the beaches while emergency personnel gathered to monitor the situation, she said, which “prioritized both public safety and the prevention of unnecessary panic.”

A 9th telecoms firm has been hit by a massive Chinese espionage campaign, the White House saysRourkela, Nov 24 (PTI) Odisha CM Mohan Charan Majhi on Sunday launched the disbursement of money under the state's financial assistance scheme 'Subhadra Yojana' for 20 lakh women. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had unveiled the scheme on September 17. So far, 80 lakh women have received Rs 5,000 as the first instalment of the scheme in phases. The latest disbursement was the third phase, and Majhi launched it from a function held at Sundergarh district. The meeting was attended by Union Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram, Deputy CM Pravati Parida and Panchayati Raj Minister Rabi Narayan Naik, among others. Under the scheme, eligible women between 21 and 60 will receive Rs 50,000 over five years till 2028-29. They will get Rs 10,000 annually in two equal instalments, credited directly to their bank accounts. Launching the disbursement, Majhi asked the women present at the function to check their mobile phones for alerts of money being credited into their bank accounts. As the mobile phones beeped, the audience cheered with applause. The deputy CM said the fourth and final phase of the first instalment is likely to be released by the end of December, covering over 1 crore women in total, after physical verification and corrections of discrepancies in applications. "Those who have not received the money will get it in the last phase in December," she said. During his one-day visit to the mineral-rich district, Majhi laid the foundation for 288 projects worth over Rs 212 crore and inaugurated 692 projects developed at Rs 808 crore. In his address, the CM said Sundergarh as the name suggest is "beautiful" and it has a huge tourism potential. He stressed the development of different tourist spots in the district. Attacking the previous BJD government, Majhi alleged that it "utilised" women for political purposes in the name of empowerment. "They were giving interest-free loans while we are providing direct financial assistance," he said. On the sidelines of the function, the CM told reporters that Sundergarh would be included in the proposed North Odisha Development Council (NODC) as promised by the BJP before the elections. (This story has not been edited by THE WEEK and is auto-generated from PTI)

The Golden State Warriors hope to retain the inside track to the NBA Cup semifinals when they visit the injury-ravaged New Orleans Pelicans on Friday night. With NBA Cup home wins over the Dallas Mavericks and Memphis Grizzlies under their belt, the Warriors will be looking not only to remain as the only unbeaten team in West Group C but also improve their point differential should it become needed. The Pelicans beat the Denver Nuggets in their only previous home game in the in-season tournament. At 1-1, they are tied with the Nuggets and Mavericks for second place in the group, but could drop the Warriors back to the pack with a win Friday. New Orleans has struggled big-time since its 101-94 victory over the Nuggets last Friday, falling to the Los Angeles Lakers, Mavericks and Cleveland Cavaliers by a total of 74 points. They are coming off a 128-100 shellacking at Cleveland on Wednesday. One positive from Wednesday's game was the play of rookie guard Antonio Reeves, who exploded for 34 points in a season-high 40 minutes. The Kentucky product had totaled just 23 points in his first eight games, and wasn't even on the active roster when the Pelicans were swept in a pair of October games at Golden State. But with Zion Williamson, Trey Murphy III, Brandon Ingram, CJ McCollum, Dejounte Murray, Herbert Jones, Jordan Hawkins and Jose Alvarado all out of the lineup, Reeves took advantage of an opportunity coach Willie Green said he worked hard to get. "It's a credit to (coach) Jodie Meeks and our Birmingham Squadron (G League) team," Green insisted. "(Reeves) coming into the gym every day, getting his shots up, paying attention, and gameplan discipline. It all pays off when you get on the floor." Already winners of six road games this season, the Warriors have no such health issues. They are missing only De'Anthony Melton, ruled out of the season this week with a partially torn left ACL. Lindy Waters III has stepped into Melton's starting spot and contributed at least two 3-pointers to each of Golden State's last three games. He had 10 points in Wednesday's 120-97 home win over the Atlanta Hawks. Buddy Hield (11 points) and Jonathan Kuminga (10) were among five others who also scored in double figures for the Warriors. They did so off the bench. Keeping them together was a big part in the decision to promote Waters, Warriors coach Steve Kerr noted after Wednesday's win. "He's a good fit next to that group," Kerr said of a starting lineup that includes Stephen Curry, Andrew Wiggins, Draymond Green and Trayce Jackson-Davis. "I like bringing Buddy off the bench. The bench group has been really good this year. Starting with Lindy allows us to keep the bench intact and gives us another shooter and defender in the starting lineup." Waters had 21 points as a reserve and Hield 28 as a starter when their roles were reversed in a 124-106 home win over the Pelicans last month that tipped off a two-game, same-site series. Hield (21 points) returned to the bench for the rematch, a 104-89 Golden State triumph that allowed them to complete a sweep without Curry, who was nursing a strained left ankle. -Field Level MediaAnge Postecoglou searching for answers over Tottenham’s injury crisis

The Sweden midfielder hailed Saturday’s 4-0 thrashing of the champions as the best game of his career. The 24-year-old delivered an outstanding performance as Spurs shattered the champions’ 52-game unbeaten home run, helping start the rout with a superb cross for James Maddison’s opening goal. Kulusevski said: “I believed (we would win) this because in the past years, we’ve come here and played really well. “So this is the game I look forward to most in the year and, once again, it happened – glory to God. “I’d say it’s the best result ever in my career. It’s a big night for the whole club, for the coach, for the players. “Because City have a lot of the ball sometimes, we can rest when we defend. There’s also so much space up there, we play one against one and then it’s always dangerous because we have a lot of quality. “It’s always great to play great teams because they always want to play football. When you play lower teams, sometimes it’s not. There’s not much football played because they are a lot of fouls, a lot of injuries and it’s slow going.” Maddison stole the show with two goals in quick succession in the first half while Pedro Porro and Brennan Johnson later got on the scoresheet. Kulu-chef-ski cooked 👨‍🍳 📊 @KumhoTyreUK pic.twitter.com/CsrTh5oUgn — Tottenham Hotspur (@SpursOfficial) November 24, 2024 Yet Kulusevski’s performance was also eye-catching and the player himself believes there is plenty more to come from him. Asked if his form made him feel “unstoppable”, Kulusevski said: “I feel like that. I feel very good and I’m trying to keep this way. I’m very happy, I’m trying to improve. “I started the season good but there is over half of the season left and I hope I can do much better. “I think I have something that no other player has. With my engine, with my heart – I don’t get tired – I feel like I can do a lot still in my career.” Spurs have won more matches against Pep Guardiola's Man City than any other side 👀 pic.twitter.com/BHLZqde9sP — Premier League (@premierleague) November 23, 2024 Tottenham’s scintillating performance marked a spectacular return to form after their dismal loss to Ipswich in their previous Premier League outing. Kulusevski said: “We have to be much more consistent. It’s not a turning point. We just have to be better in other games. “This game suited us perfectly but we have a lot of improvement to make in the other games.”In their final fixture of 2024, Kai Havertz scored the only goal of the game midway through the opening period. Arsenal’s victory takes them back to within six points of leaders Liverpool, having played one match more than the Reds, and a point clear of Chelsea following their Boxing Day defeat to Fulham. Ipswich, although much improved in the second half, have now lost five of their last six games, and remain just one place off the bottom of the table, three points away from safety. 🎯 pic.twitter.com/hDd5bkHwXr — Arsenal (@Arsenal) December 27, 2024 Mikel Arteta’s men have been rocked by Bukayo Saka’s hamstring injury which could keep the England winger, who has nine goals and 13 assists this season, out of action for the next two months. Gabriel Martinelli was handed the unenviable task of filling Saka’s shoes on Arsenal’s right-hand side and the Brazilian was involved in the only goal of the evening. The Ipswich defence failed to deal with Martinelli’s cross, with the ball falling to Leandro Trossard on the opposite side of the area. Trossard fought his way to the byline before fizzing his cross into the box for Havertz to convert from a matter of yards. It was Havertz’s third goal in four matches, his 12th of the season, and no less than the hosts, who at that stage of the match had enjoyed a staggering 91.4 per cent of the possession, deserved. Heading into Friday’s fixture, Arsenal had lost only one of their last 75 Premier League games when they had opened the scoring, and their triumph here rarely looked in doubt following Havertz’s strike. Three points that take Arsenal into second 🪜 #ARSIPS pic.twitter.com/Dx3s6XlwQ2 — Premier League (@premierleague) December 27, 2024 Havertz thought he had doubled Arsenal’s lead with 34 minutes gone when he converted Gabriel Jesus’ cross. But Jesus – handed his third successive start for the first time in a year – strayed into an offside position in the build-up. When referee Darren England blew for half-time, Ipswich had failed to touch the ball in Arsenal’s box, becoming just the second side to do so in the Premier League this season. Nottingham Forest were the other, away at Liverpool, before they went on to inflict Arne Slot’s sole defeat of his tenure so far. And for all of Arsenal’s possession, while they held just a one-goal advantage, Ipswich knew they were still in the game. An encouraging start to the second half for the Tractor Boys ensued, albeit without testing David Raya in the Arsenal goal. Shortly after the hour mark, Gabriel should have settled any growing Emirates nerves when he arrived unmarked to Declan Rice’s corner, but the defender headed wide of Arijanet Muric’s post when it looked easier to score. Just over an hour on the clock. #ARSIPS pic.twitter.com/JXNipX1J1Z — IPSWICH TOWN (@IpswichTown) December 27, 2024 Martin Odegaard then forced a fine fingertip save from Muric at his near post after a mazy run and shot from the Arsenal skipper. Rice’s stinging goal-bound volley from the following corner was blocked by Dara O’Shea as Arsenal pushed for a game-killing second. Havertz should have tapped home Trossard’s header but he fluffed his lines. And moments later, substitute Mikel Merino’s effort was diverted from danger by a diving Muric. Ipswich looked to catch Arsenal on the counter, but the match ended without them registering a single effort on Raya’s goal. Ipswich fans goaded their opponents with chants of “boring, boring Arsenal”, but it was the Gunners who enjoyed the last laugh as they saw out 2024 with a win which keeps the pressure on Liverpool.Georgia lawmakers can can subpoena Fani Willis for information related to Trump case, court rules